Christine+Moore

media type="custom" key="9832861"**Christine Moore's Willow Wiki Page **


 * Final Project: media type="custom" key="10242575" **

Script:

Hey Christine,

Great job on final project. Nice work. Tiffany

__**June 23, 2011**__ __**My week two assignment:**__



I have made some changes to it, hoping it is more clear.

June 30, 2011 Week four: First storyboard draft; Need, Research, Development, Commercialization

Note to group: I have having some difficulty with the research for web 2.0. It is unclear who actually began this, and there is no real commercialization to speak of. You will see what I mean when you see the ppt. If you have any ideas, I would welcome them. Web 2.0 seems to be a rather "floaty" topic. It's tough to pin down and say, "This is when it started, this is who did it, here is why." It seems to have just grown into what it is without any real plan or thought. I begin to wonder if Web 2.0 was the result of serendipity. Something that began as a way for businesses to increase productivity (as far as I can tell) simply mushroomed. Again, I am eager for any thoughts you might have. Thanks!



Hey Christine,

Your storyboard is coming along. I hope you've found the research that you were looking for. If I see anything, I will be sure to let you know. Good job though:)4

Tiffany July 7, 2011

HI Christine, I hope this is ok... I was looking over your PPT and see you have gotten a lot of work done. I had some thoughts as I was looking over the information:

Love the great start you have to this!
 * I was wondering where you go the information you've share one Page 3 regarding the "Read-Write Web?" I had not heard that before.
 * I think your barriers are great but I thought of one you don't have listed: CyberSafety Concerns. What do you think?
 * For Slide 8, I might suggest adding Conferences for marketing. At least in Education, this is a very popular route.

Carol - I appreciate your effort! But for me, I prefer it to be on one page...too many places to have to go look otherwise! Thanks!

As for "Read-Write Web"...that has been around a while, but thanks for reminding me and I added the references to the slide Doesn't "word of mouth" count for conferences? (yes, been to my share of them! ha!) Safety...yes, that is a good one - I'll look through my articles and see if I can find some references to back it up as being a barrier, thanks!

__** Week 5 update: July 8 **__ Ok...here is my updated version. Following the advice of Dr. Watson, I provided a "timeline" (but not really) of how the web has changed from 1.0 - 2.0



7/10/11 - I don't know, to me "word of mouth" implies informal and conferences are not that. But, it was just a suggestion..:) I'll read the articles you shared about the "Read-Write Web." I see the additions of the timeline components. There is a lot of discussion, it seems, on what it is called and I find that interesting. Are you seeing that as it evolved so did it's name? Much like the expeted development of Web 2.0 as you mentioned? Thanks.- Carol __**﻿**__ Hi, Carol! Yes, the terminology is used interchangeably, although most know only the term "Web 2.0". I think the "read-write web" is more descriptive, but I suppose it is not catchy enough! The term web 2.0 seemed to be a result of Tim O'Reilly's use of the phrase, although now he has decided he was wrong in the description of what web 2.0 is. Web 2.0 is more of a concept, than an actual product - that is one reason I don't include conferences. Does that make sense? All the conferences are very specific: wiki, social networking, etc. As for informal, most of what I get from those conferences comes from my informal discussions with other educators...does that make sense? I am finding this topic to be very interesting, particularly the fact that nobody seems to actually be able to pin down a definition everyone can agree upon. Tim O'Reilly's definition seems to be the most widely accepted. Of course, now he has said himself that his definition was wrong. So continues the saga of web 2.0....where will it lead??

Thanks SO MUCH for your feedback!! :D

Hi Christine...well, not really, if I'm honest. I think read-write can be too restrictive...while web 2.0 sounds more global. It seems like a lot of fuss over something that is pretty much just a name. LOL! With the web changing at the rate it is, there is no wonder that it can't be pinned down. Seems futile to try to capture it. I guess that's what the "names" in the biz are for! Carol

July 11, 2011 Hey,

Your storyboard is looking good. I did not know what web 2.0 was exactly but I'm glad you shared that it is more like a concept than a product. It sounds like one of the new buzz words that has spread rapidly through the education community. I am looking forward to expanding my knowledge in this area.

Tiffany


 * Week 6 Storyboard update **
 * Ok...my s-curve is added - but I could not create the true s-curve because web 2.0 is constantly evolving. So I created an s-curve showing the changes as Dr. Thornburg discussed in the video about the s-curve in this week's resources. I also could not complete the S because we are still watching this concept change...talk of 3.0 and 4.0 abound. **

Hey Christine,

I like the idea of the timeline for your innovation. I also was wondering what do you think the future will hold for 3.0 or 4.0 and what do anticipate the S-curve will look like? Great job:)

Tiffany

Week 7 Storyboard Update - 7/21/11



Christine, I took a look at the S-Curve and thought it was great to really get the feel how the Web 1.0 declined when the growth of Web 2.0. It is amazing how fast, once adopted, the innovations sweep upwards. I wanted to also let you know that I think the project is coming along nicely. The additions have been well-thought out and the read is pleasant and not over-cluttered. I like the idea of the timeline and I'll be adding that to mine as well. Dr. Watson had a good idea with that concept as it does also clarify other information you are providing in your presentation. Nice job! Carol

Hey Christine,

Your additional slides look very good and your storyboard is well done. Your presentation is looking more toward completion. Keep up the great work, your doing a very nice job.

Tiffany

Hi Chrisitine, Your storyboard is looking good. You provide enough information to allow a person to follow the innovation process of Web 2.0. Keep it moving!

Respectfully, jerome

Week 8 update...sorry it's late....

Hey Christine, Almost there... looking good. Tiffany

And week 9......

Looks completed... kudos:) Tiffany